Everything you need to understand AI search visibility — the research behind it, how to fix it, and what actually moves the needle.
If your pages aren't showing up when buyers ask ChatGPT or Perplexity for recommendations, these resources explain why — and exactly what to change. Start with the free implementation guide or run a free audit on any page.
Step-by-step instructions for applying every fix type — BLUF rewrites, FAQ blocks, H2 restructuring, and JSON-LD schema — across WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, and more. No coding required for most fixes.
Paste your fix file into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, or GitHub Copilot and the AI rewrites your page with the BLUF, FAQ, H2s, and JSON-LD applied — drop it into your site and you're live in minutes. Step-by-step instructions for all four tools, plus how to verify and re-audit.
Read guide → ImplementationHow to get your website cited by ChatGPT and AI Overviews — platform-by-platform, no developer needed. Covers WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, Squarespace, and more.
Read guide → FrameworkAll 7 dimensions, their weights, and the research behind each one. Why alignment dominates, what grounding means, and how to score higher on each signal.
Explore the framework → ResearchThe peer-reviewed studies behind every SIGNALS weight. 2M+ citations analyzed across 4 papers — how we know what actually drives AI citation frequency.
Read the research → GuideWhy your website is invisible to ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity — and what AEO is. How AI citation works, how it differs from SEO, the four-stage retrieval pipeline, and the 7 signals that determine whether AI cites you.
Read guide → GuideThe 6 most common reasons AI engines skip your pages — and exactly how to fix each one. Includes a self-audit checklist and before/after examples.
Read guide → ChecklistA complete checklist of the 25 structural signals that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity cite your page. Based on 2M+ citation analysis.
View checklist → TeardownA real-world teardown of a page that executes AI citation so well that Claude consistently cites it as a neutral source. Signal by signal breakdown with proof.
Read teardown → Case StudyWe ran SIGNALS on our own site and scored 28/100 — Critical. Real before/after screenshots, every fix documented, and exactly why each one worked. One afternoon, no developer.
Read case study → ExplainerHow ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity actually retrieve and cite content — the four stages, where most pages fail, and what to fix first.
Read explainer →SIGNALS vs Profound vs Otterly AI vs AEO agencies — real pricing, honest pros/cons, and who each is actually for. The only guide that tells you which category you need before picking a tool.
The SIGNALS framework is grounded in peer-reviewed research. These are the four papers that inform every dimension, weight, and recommendation in the audit.
2M+ citations analyzed across 4 engines. Found prompt-content alignment (β=+0.37) is the dominant predictor — above domain authority and all structural signals.
Read paper ↗10,000 queries tested. Adding statistics increased AI visibility by 41%, source citations by 40%, expert quotes by 28%. The foundational peer-reviewed study.
Read paper ↗First taxonomy of AI citation failure modes: retrieval, parsing, ranking, generation. 40%+ citation improvement by targeting the actual failure stage.
Read paper ↗12,500+ queries, 8,000 domains. 83% of AI citations come from outside Google's top 10. Heading hierarchy present in 68.7% of cited pages.
Read paper ↗Start with the free SIGNALS audit — it tells you exactly which of the 7 citation signals your page is failing. Then use the Manual Implementation Guide to apply the fixes: BLUF rewrite, buyer-language FAQ, H2 restructuring, and JSON-LD schema. The research section explains the peer-reviewed evidence behind each fix type.
SEO optimizes for Google's PageRank algorithm: backlinks, domain authority, click-through rate. AEO optimizes for AI retrieval pipelines: vocabulary alignment, structural clarity, sourced statistics, quotable content. According to ConvertMate's GEO Benchmark (2026), 83% of AI citations now come from pages outside Google's top 10 — meaning strong SEO rankings no longer predict AI citation. You need both, and they require different fixes.
Alignment — making sure your page vocabulary matches how buyers actually search — carries 35% of the SIGNALS score and is the only signal with a documented causal effect independent of domain authority (Discovered Labs, 2026, β=+0.37). Adding sourced statistics is the second biggest lever: Princeton GEO (KDD 2024) found it increases AI visibility by 41%.
AI index refresh typically takes 2–4 weeks after a page is updated. Structural fixes (BLUF, FAQ, schema) are picked up faster than vocabulary changes, which require re-indexing. Most users see measurable SIGNALS score improvement immediately after applying fixes, and AI citation frequency changes within 2–6 weeks as crawlers re-process the updated content.
Paste any URL and get a full SIGNALS report — score, pipeline diagnosis, and generated fixes. Free for one page.
Score my page free →